A 40,000‑acre data centre project in Box Elder County, Utah, was approved despite local opposition; the hyperscale facility, partly backed by Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary, is expected to consume 9 gigawatts when fully built — more than double Utah’s current statewide usage of about 4 gigawatts 1.

The decision highlights broader tensions as companies race to build energy‑intensive AI infrastructure, touching off fights over grid capacity, utility bills and environmental impact 1. A Pew Research Center survey found 43% of Americans cite data centres as a major reason for rising home energy costs, with similar concerns across party lines 1.

In Georgia, multibillion‑dollar data‑centre developments have provoked bipartisan backlash: Politico reported that 47% of local voters oppose planned projects, turning data centres into a campaign issue in some local races 1.

Communities and local officials say they fear strain on resources and higher prices, while proponents frame projects as economic drivers. Those competing arguments — and the scale of projects such as the Utah site — suggest data‑centre expansion will remain a flashpoint in states facing AI‑driven growth 1.

How this was made. This article was assembled by Startupniti's editorial AI from the source listed in the right rail. The synthesis ran through our 4-model cascade (Gemini Flash Lite → GPT-4o-mini → DeepSeek → Llama 3.3 70B), logged to ops.llm_calls. Every fact traces to a citation. If a fact looks wrong, write to corrections.